How deindustrialization has been used as a geopolitical tool to maintain the Globalist Empire and the personalities, NGOs and media narratives that promote the anti-human ideology behind it.
“The bicycle is the most important means of transportation in Cuba. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the economic crisis that ensued , the Cuban government made available to its citizens several million Chinese-made bicycles. Bicycles outnumber motor vehicles, both on the rural highways and in the cities. Bikes are used to transport goods and it's not unusual to see passengers on a bike, either on the rear rack or on the top tube--sometimes both!”
Curiously a few years ago Joe Bray-Ali the owner of the Flying Pigeon bicycle shop in LA tried to run for City Council in part on a “bike lanes can prevent gentrification” platform. “Flying Pigeon” refers to the bicycles that were common in China up until fairly recently as the country has largely become more urbanized and developed. His business imported those bicycles.
Joe Bray-Ali‘s campaign was cut short after he was revealed to have posted seedy content on social media site Voat. Typical of CA’s progressives and the LA Swamp politicians, some of the the comments were racist.
I think this is why self-styled communists here in the West see how countries like Cuba and China have on bicycling and they think the two good hand in hand. "Communism is when everyone is poor" - and they endorse it! For what it's worth, China had the fastest-growing car market in the world!
Your essay is very well written but has me scratching my head. I do agree that the WEF's move to reduce nitrogen is insane and the policy has destroyed Sri Lanka and other countries that are trying to implement it. I grow Cannabis and am well aware of plants dependency on Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium. Reduce any one of these components, NPK, and you reduce yields. But I do find it strange that while you mention the India activist you don't say much about the role of the World Economic Forum which is out to enslave the entire planet.
Where I vehemently disagree is your push for GMO farming -- using genetically modified seeds (which is probably responsible for causing damage to the human gut biome) and the use of Glyphosate (which also causes disease). Of course GMO farming is also being pushed by the WEF, the UN and Corporate Agriculture. GMO farming also reduces the nutritional value of foods, destroys the micro organisms crucial for plant metabolism, destroys the arable land (e.g., soil) and much more. And today these globalists are pushing for introducing mRNA poisons into our fruits and vegetables just as they pushed to put fluoride into our water supplies. The fact is because of these practices the nutritional value of fruits and vegetables has been reduced by nearly 90 percent since GMO agriculture began in the 1990's. We also badly need to replenish the soil with trace minerals etc. that have been depleted from farming itself.
I am an Anti-Globalist and am against the entire globalist strategy for a "Great Reset" being pushed by the UN, WEF, Blackrock and most global corporations -- Open Borders, Digital ID's, Digital Currency, Mass Censorship, Nitrogen reduction in farming, forced vaccination etc. If they prevail we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation. Again my criticism of your essay is you don't really identify the globalists as the primary promoters of GMO farming and Nitrogen reduction. Both are bad ideas. I would encourage you to read through my Substack essays to better understand my point of view.
Perhaps I was a bit harsh as you do seem to be like me: an Anti-Globalist. But when Cynthia talked about GMO terminator genetics you didn't seem to know what that meant. It means Monsanto/Bayer genetically modified the seeds -- using technologies like CRISPR -- so you could not save seeds from the plants: obviously in order to make farmers dependent on buying more Monsanto seeds. They also modified the seeds to produce pesticides to kill insect predators. There are many papers raising the alarm that these endogenous pesticides -- in the plants -- are causing harm to the human gut biome resulting in disease.
Same can be said of the mRNA Covid-19 injections -- which are not real vaccines by the older definition. Recently papers have come out saying that these injections are modifying our DNA, allowing the nanoparticles to enter the brain and causing untold harm and death. Worse yet Biden and other globalist leaders coerced the population to take this poison. I'm a health care analyst and also worked five years in medical research. While I believe in free choice I haven't had a vaccine in over 50 years. I would NEVER take a mRNA injection and would caution other to refuse as well. But if I were still working, and supporting a family, I would have been forced to take the poison. From supporting lobotomies, to fluoride in the water, to sex changing herbicides the globalists have harmed the people again and again. Biden is supporting the WHO Pandemic Treaty which would give the WHO global authority to mandate future mRNA injections. It is patently insane.
So it is a good thing -- we are both Anti-Globalists. My concern is that you are far to embracing of these technologies. It reminds me of the story of Adam and Eve. By all means eat from the fruit of knowledge but NEVER EVER manipulate the Tree of Life. Yes you can use CRISPR etc. to modify DNA . . . but you haven't a foggy clue of the possible problems such meddling can create. Mendellian genetic modification is fine: we've been doing it for hundreds of years. CRISPR genetic modification is beyond the "pay grade" of any human and should be prohibited.
Frankly I would rather play my guitar and never write again. But I have grandchildren and will not allow for a "Great Reset" where we become nothing more than slaves on a Global Plantation. The most important part of my work is to get people to embrace the Anti-Globalist "Put People First" agenda which is intended to rip the globalist agenda out by the roots. When people go before their City Councils to demand the Illegals are sent back, or to demand an end to CRT/LGBTQ curriculums I will be encouraging them to say that they are just fighting one aspect of the globalist agenda and that they support most/all of the PPF agenda. I will leave a link that enumerates the planks of the PPF. I'd be interested to know what you think of this strategy. It may be our only hope and I used a similar strategy (1990 - 2018) to successfully legalize Cannabis. With Cannabis the strategy was to stage annual protests throughout the planet. The PPF strategy is a bit different as it will initially focus on local activism. We're all in this together -- every human on planet Earth. All of us is all we need.
You will find the planks to the PPF in this essay and I will soon create a single essay expanding on the PPF strategy.
=====
As I wrote this the emergency broadcast had already occurred and I don't feel any symptoms of Marburg nor do I feel like I'm turning into a zombie. Perhaps there is a delayed response though I remain skeptical. At the same time there is no doubt that EMF radiation can activate dormant virus -- regardless of being vaccinated or unvaccinated. From a larger perspective the globalist clusterfuck, which I have alluded to in previous essays, is moving forward unabated. And both the "forced vaccination" agenda and the expansion of 5G antennas are part of that globalist agenda.
Could the Nationwide Emergency Alert Test(10/04/2023) be used to activate the Marburg Virus creating a new Plandemic?
Could the test emit a frequency that activates viruses in those that got the mRNA injection?
If you are interested we could do a podcast where I'd be more than happy to discuss my activism and the PPF agenda. My strategy did work with Cannabis legalization. I hope the PPF strategy will put an end to the demonic Globalist agenda in a similar way.
Thanks for your comments Bruce. I think the reason we disagree in some areas is because of the different axioms on which we operate. See this post for more details on that:
"Rather than saying “the technology of this vaccine was used to harm rather than help humanity,” the conversation led by RFK Jr is that vaccine technology is inherently bad. Just as he believes energy technology (such as nuclear power) or agricultural technology (such as fertilizer or GMO) is also inherently bad."
As I previously wrote I am against the globalists push to reduce Nitrogen as it ultimately means reducing food production. I am diametrically opposed to GMO farming for reasons I've already covered in a previous post to you.
In my view both mRNA injections and GMO farming are a misuse of technology. The activist from India at least understands that everything in the universe is connected . . . which is why we must be mindful when we think of interfering with these systems: whether that be manipulating plant genetics or introducing a DNA changing mRNA system into the human body. The fact you don't know what terminator genes are -- with regard to GMO seeds -- is concerning. That is pretty basic stuff. Do you understand the dangers of CRISPR technology in the manipulation of human DNA? I hope so but your pro technology stance is concerning.
I am not a Luddite. My entire career was that of a Health Care Systems Analyst for goodness sakes. Thank god I'm now retired. The reason we have lost trust in our scientists, institutions etc. is because they don't follow the science but rather the money. I helped author multiple NIH grants while in medical research. The problem is "science" has been hijacked by the globalists. For example if you challenge the Green Agenda you won't get a federal grant. There is no Anthropogenic Climate Change. It is a big fat lie to use Climate Change, Carbon Taxes etc. to gain global control.
I rarely find anyone that I completely agree with whether that be Kazinsky or RFK. I certainly do not endorse the violence Kazinsky promulgated but his manifesto is quite interesting when you consider when it was written. I try to distill what I can from many, many people and sources. Sometimes even the idiots have something useful to share.
Did you read the essay containing the planks of the Put People First (PPF) agenda? What are your impressions? Would you do a podcast so we can discuss my agenda. If you are interested in doing a podcast on the PPF agenda I will be available. Otherwise I've other things to do.
I am familiar with the intellectual property enforcement tactics done by companies like Monsanto - I had never heard them referred to as suicide seeds before, which is why I asked what that was. I agree with you on the climate change scheme as a means of control. My work revolves around the 'why' of people who pursue such schemes, which is a much more philosophical and/or religious question. Why do some people want to reduce the population? Bottom line is that they see mankind as an animal that must be culled occasionally to adhere to their prescribed "rules of nature."
You're right that technology can be misused, but that does not mean we turn our backs on technology. Nuclear bombs were the worst evil unleashed on mankind. Nuclear energy is a miracle that promises poverty-ending abundance and the possibility of space exploration. Technology, whether it's GMOs, vaccines or fuel for energy are neutral, how we decide to use it is what makes it good or evil.
Question: What do you think of Diane Sare? She's the LaRouchean candidate for the state of New York, and being that you are in New York I was wondering what were your opinions of her? In with RFK JR? Where did she stand on Indian Point Nuclear?
Great stuff here, and nicely tied together. I basically think Vandana is responsible for mass murder of humans and natural places, and I am glad to see the critique of RFK Jr. and all of his scientism BS.
I am not so sold on Russia and China stuff though- those governments are absolutely terrible. I do want to make sure we don't hate on the people subject to those regimes though- much like us in the west, there are only limited things they can do to about it as individuals. I do think we should push to support any and all of the development initiatives that they try though, as getting people out of the mud should be an incredibly high priority for everyone.
Thank you, I'm glad you liked the piece and that we can agree on Shiva/RFK. Getting people out of poverty is the main goal, I also agree with you there!
I read the whole thing! I am surprised someone wrote the whole article as well! This should be a book already.
Good work Fox
Thank you Jusper! I’ll turn it into a book someday
Speaking of Cuba:
“The bicycle is the most important means of transportation in Cuba. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the economic crisis that ensued , the Cuban government made available to its citizens several million Chinese-made bicycles. Bicycles outnumber motor vehicles, both on the rural highways and in the cities. Bikes are used to transport goods and it's not unusual to see passengers on a bike, either on the rear rack or on the top tube--sometimes both!”
https://www.bicyclinglife.com/NewsAndViews/cuba.htm
And of China:
Curiously a few years ago Joe Bray-Ali the owner of the Flying Pigeon bicycle shop in LA tried to run for City Council in part on a “bike lanes can prevent gentrification” platform. “Flying Pigeon” refers to the bicycles that were common in China up until fairly recently as the country has largely become more urbanized and developed. His business imported those bicycles.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/this-city-council-candidate-thinks-bike-lanes-will-solve-las-gentrification-issues
Joe Bray-Ali‘s campaign was cut short after he was revealed to have posted seedy content on social media site Voat. Typical of CA’s progressives and the LA Swamp politicians, some of the the comments were racist.
Even the LA Times rescinded their endorsement of him. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-endorsement-recinded-bray-ali-20170427-story.html
I think this is why self-styled communists here in the West see how countries like Cuba and China have on bicycling and they think the two good hand in hand. "Communism is when everyone is poor" - and they endorse it! For what it's worth, China had the fastest-growing car market in the world!
If they are truly objective, critical thinkers and believe in science. They’ll learn from this microbiologist who actually researched the gm0 science. It’s all there. Gm0s something https://vashiva.com/dr-shiva-live-mit-phd-reveals-the-big-lie-about-gmos/
Claims that gm0 are green is a stretch https://www.technologyreview.com/2013/12/17/82673/gmos-are-green/
Special lecture https://www.youtube.com/live/vh5hJ6NyzIA?si=gPHNyRfuYFiyJCp5
Your essay is very well written but has me scratching my head. I do agree that the WEF's move to reduce nitrogen is insane and the policy has destroyed Sri Lanka and other countries that are trying to implement it. I grow Cannabis and am well aware of plants dependency on Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium. Reduce any one of these components, NPK, and you reduce yields. But I do find it strange that while you mention the India activist you don't say much about the role of the World Economic Forum which is out to enslave the entire planet.
Where I vehemently disagree is your push for GMO farming -- using genetically modified seeds (which is probably responsible for causing damage to the human gut biome) and the use of Glyphosate (which also causes disease). Of course GMO farming is also being pushed by the WEF, the UN and Corporate Agriculture. GMO farming also reduces the nutritional value of foods, destroys the micro organisms crucial for plant metabolism, destroys the arable land (e.g., soil) and much more. And today these globalists are pushing for introducing mRNA poisons into our fruits and vegetables just as they pushed to put fluoride into our water supplies. The fact is because of these practices the nutritional value of fruits and vegetables has been reduced by nearly 90 percent since GMO agriculture began in the 1990's. We also badly need to replenish the soil with trace minerals etc. that have been depleted from farming itself.
I am an Anti-Globalist and am against the entire globalist strategy for a "Great Reset" being pushed by the UN, WEF, Blackrock and most global corporations -- Open Borders, Digital ID's, Digital Currency, Mass Censorship, Nitrogen reduction in farming, forced vaccination etc. If they prevail we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation. Again my criticism of your essay is you don't really identify the globalists as the primary promoters of GMO farming and Nitrogen reduction. Both are bad ideas. I would encourage you to read through my Substack essays to better understand my point of view.
https://brucecain.substack.com/
This is also worth a read:
The Great Reset Starts with Farms (07/19/2022)
Heads of state are embracing the World Economic Forum’s agricultural agenda. Will farmers be able to push back?
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-world-economic-forums-agricultural-revolution/
Thanks Bruce - I highly recommend listening to our podcast episode with Cynthia Chung, in which we discuss GMOs amongst many other things you might find interesting. https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/ep-034-there-are-no-limits-to-scientific-53e#details
Perhaps I was a bit harsh as you do seem to be like me: an Anti-Globalist. But when Cynthia talked about GMO terminator genetics you didn't seem to know what that meant. It means Monsanto/Bayer genetically modified the seeds -- using technologies like CRISPR -- so you could not save seeds from the plants: obviously in order to make farmers dependent on buying more Monsanto seeds. They also modified the seeds to produce pesticides to kill insect predators. There are many papers raising the alarm that these endogenous pesticides -- in the plants -- are causing harm to the human gut biome resulting in disease.
Same can be said of the mRNA Covid-19 injections -- which are not real vaccines by the older definition. Recently papers have come out saying that these injections are modifying our DNA, allowing the nanoparticles to enter the brain and causing untold harm and death. Worse yet Biden and other globalist leaders coerced the population to take this poison. I'm a health care analyst and also worked five years in medical research. While I believe in free choice I haven't had a vaccine in over 50 years. I would NEVER take a mRNA injection and would caution other to refuse as well. But if I were still working, and supporting a family, I would have been forced to take the poison. From supporting lobotomies, to fluoride in the water, to sex changing herbicides the globalists have harmed the people again and again. Biden is supporting the WHO Pandemic Treaty which would give the WHO global authority to mandate future mRNA injections. It is patently insane.
So it is a good thing -- we are both Anti-Globalists. My concern is that you are far to embracing of these technologies. It reminds me of the story of Adam and Eve. By all means eat from the fruit of knowledge but NEVER EVER manipulate the Tree of Life. Yes you can use CRISPR etc. to modify DNA . . . but you haven't a foggy clue of the possible problems such meddling can create. Mendellian genetic modification is fine: we've been doing it for hundreds of years. CRISPR genetic modification is beyond the "pay grade" of any human and should be prohibited.
Frankly I would rather play my guitar and never write again. But I have grandchildren and will not allow for a "Great Reset" where we become nothing more than slaves on a Global Plantation. The most important part of my work is to get people to embrace the Anti-Globalist "Put People First" agenda which is intended to rip the globalist agenda out by the roots. When people go before their City Councils to demand the Illegals are sent back, or to demand an end to CRT/LGBTQ curriculums I will be encouraging them to say that they are just fighting one aspect of the globalist agenda and that they support most/all of the PPF agenda. I will leave a link that enumerates the planks of the PPF. I'd be interested to know what you think of this strategy. It may be our only hope and I used a similar strategy (1990 - 2018) to successfully legalize Cannabis. With Cannabis the strategy was to stage annual protests throughout the planet. The PPF strategy is a bit different as it will initially focus on local activism. We're all in this together -- every human on planet Earth. All of us is all we need.
There are no Limits to Scientific Abundance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2M8DznE-5uo
You will find the planks to the PPF in this essay and I will soon create a single essay expanding on the PPF strategy.
=====
As I wrote this the emergency broadcast had already occurred and I don't feel any symptoms of Marburg nor do I feel like I'm turning into a zombie. Perhaps there is a delayed response though I remain skeptical. At the same time there is no doubt that EMF radiation can activate dormant virus -- regardless of being vaccinated or unvaccinated. From a larger perspective the globalist clusterfuck, which I have alluded to in previous essays, is moving forward unabated. And both the "forced vaccination" agenda and the expansion of 5G antennas are part of that globalist agenda.
Could the Nationwide Emergency Alert Test(10/04/2023) be used to activate the Marburg Virus creating a new Plandemic?
Could the test emit a frequency that activates viruses in those that got the mRNA injection?
https://brucecain.substack.com/p/could-the-nationwide-emergency-alert
=====
If you are interested we could do a podcast where I'd be more than happy to discuss my activism and the PPF agenda. My strategy did work with Cannabis legalization. I hope the PPF strategy will put an end to the demonic Globalist agenda in a similar way.
Thanks for your comments Bruce. I think the reason we disagree in some areas is because of the different axioms on which we operate. See this post for more details on that:
https://open.substack.com/pub/spacecommune/p/robert-kennedy-jr-is-anti-technology?r=2ikqc1&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
From your link:
"Rather than saying “the technology of this vaccine was used to harm rather than help humanity,” the conversation led by RFK Jr is that vaccine technology is inherently bad. Just as he believes energy technology (such as nuclear power) or agricultural technology (such as fertilizer or GMO) is also inherently bad."
As I previously wrote I am against the globalists push to reduce Nitrogen as it ultimately means reducing food production. I am diametrically opposed to GMO farming for reasons I've already covered in a previous post to you.
In my view both mRNA injections and GMO farming are a misuse of technology. The activist from India at least understands that everything in the universe is connected . . . which is why we must be mindful when we think of interfering with these systems: whether that be manipulating plant genetics or introducing a DNA changing mRNA system into the human body. The fact you don't know what terminator genes are -- with regard to GMO seeds -- is concerning. That is pretty basic stuff. Do you understand the dangers of CRISPR technology in the manipulation of human DNA? I hope so but your pro technology stance is concerning.
I am not a Luddite. My entire career was that of a Health Care Systems Analyst for goodness sakes. Thank god I'm now retired. The reason we have lost trust in our scientists, institutions etc. is because they don't follow the science but rather the money. I helped author multiple NIH grants while in medical research. The problem is "science" has been hijacked by the globalists. For example if you challenge the Green Agenda you won't get a federal grant. There is no Anthropogenic Climate Change. It is a big fat lie to use Climate Change, Carbon Taxes etc. to gain global control.
I rarely find anyone that I completely agree with whether that be Kazinsky or RFK. I certainly do not endorse the violence Kazinsky promulgated but his manifesto is quite interesting when you consider when it was written. I try to distill what I can from many, many people and sources. Sometimes even the idiots have something useful to share.
Did you read the essay containing the planks of the Put People First (PPF) agenda? What are your impressions? Would you do a podcast so we can discuss my agenda. If you are interested in doing a podcast on the PPF agenda I will be available. Otherwise I've other things to do.
I am familiar with the intellectual property enforcement tactics done by companies like Monsanto - I had never heard them referred to as suicide seeds before, which is why I asked what that was. I agree with you on the climate change scheme as a means of control. My work revolves around the 'why' of people who pursue such schemes, which is a much more philosophical and/or religious question. Why do some people want to reduce the population? Bottom line is that they see mankind as an animal that must be culled occasionally to adhere to their prescribed "rules of nature."
You're right that technology can be misused, but that does not mean we turn our backs on technology. Nuclear bombs were the worst evil unleashed on mankind. Nuclear energy is a miracle that promises poverty-ending abundance and the possibility of space exploration. Technology, whether it's GMOs, vaccines or fuel for energy are neutral, how we decide to use it is what makes it good or evil.
So what is your view on the "Put People First" Anti-Globalist Agenda. At the end of the day this Globalist agenda must be stopped.
Question: What do you think of Diane Sare? She's the LaRouchean candidate for the state of New York, and being that you are in New York I was wondering what were your opinions of her? In with RFK JR? Where did she stand on Indian Point Nuclear?
I know Diane well - in fact, I knocked on some doors for her last election cycle! She was very vocally opposed to the closure of Indian Point. Had a great conversation with her on the Space Commune podcast last year: https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/ep-025-the-inalienable-rights-of-90f#details
Great stuff here, and nicely tied together. I basically think Vandana is responsible for mass murder of humans and natural places, and I am glad to see the critique of RFK Jr. and all of his scientism BS.
I am not so sold on Russia and China stuff though- those governments are absolutely terrible. I do want to make sure we don't hate on the people subject to those regimes though- much like us in the west, there are only limited things they can do to about it as individuals. I do think we should push to support any and all of the development initiatives that they try though, as getting people out of the mud should be an incredibly high priority for everyone.
Thank you, I'm glad you liked the piece and that we can agree on Shiva/RFK. Getting people out of poverty is the main goal, I also agree with you there!